emile wrote:
Best of both worlds I think. Does that make sense or am I missing something?
i agree emile. well, to some extent. the Boven collated PDF is great (tks again mr pedley) - no need to search; stitch & patch different pages together. sure, new routes are getting opened but we can deal with that on an annual basis or something. and i doubt that there will be many new routes added to established magaliesberg areas - at least 99% of the easy to moderate routes has been climbed; i guess most of the hard ones too. the current RDs are also difficult to follow - some very vague descriptions ("move left at the small tree" - RD from 1948 or something).
TM makes for easier & clearer RDs because you can put 20+ routes in a single picture due to the elevation of the rock. magalies is a different animal, but i still think it is a worthwhile project for a few intrepid magalies lovers to put together an RD that's comparable to the TM one.
shorti wrote:
I'll do my part and team up with a magalies virgin, or at least a foreigner and take them up some fun routes.
pick me! pick me!
